Legal Opinion

Provo City v. Ivie

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 25, 2008No. 20070490-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 In 2002, Provo City sought to condemn Appellants’ property to build a road and bike path that would connect two existing Provo streets. Because their property is in an unincorporated area of Utah County, Appellants disputed Provo’s right to condemn the property. Provo City moved for immediate occupancy, which was granted, although the trial court stayed enforcement to allow Appellants to pursue an interlocutory appeal in the Utah Supreme Court. The Utah Supreme Court held that because Provo City was not a chartered city, it could not exercise the eminent domain powers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Z.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Alvarez v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Provo City v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Utah County v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salt Lake County v. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  2. Mallory v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. GalindoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. Mallory v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API