Legal Opinion
Howard v. Lockhart
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 9, 1989No. 89-216, 89-94, and 89-93PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
These cases are consolidated, inasmuch as they have common characteristics. All are civil in nature, all are governed by the rule announced in Virgin v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 92, 702 S.W.2d 9 (1986), and Glick v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 417, 706 S.W.2d 178 (1986), and all reflect the same defect.
Roosevelt Abernathy, acting pro se, petitions for the appointment of counsel to assist him in his appeal from an order of the Jefferson Circuit Court and for permission to file a handwritten brief. Daniel Ray Howard and Elgie Sanders petition for permission to file handwritten briefs in their cases.
In Virgin…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerald D. Peterson v. Isadore NadlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Blond v. OvereschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Glick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Virgin v. AL LOCKHARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Dyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Biggs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- People v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Strawhacker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Viveros v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.