Legal Opinion
Independent Baking Powder Co. v. Boorman
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided February 29, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions
In Equity. On exceptions to answer.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit in equity brought to restrain the alleged infringement of a trade-mark. It comes now before the court on exceptions filed by the complainant to certain portions of the answer of the defendant.
The bill of complaint alleges that the Independent Baking Powder Company, and its predecessors, have been continuously and uninterruptedly engaged in the manufacture and sale of a baking powder known as “Solar Baking Powder,” for a period of not less than 17 years last past, and the facts which support the complainant’s title are set out in detail. It is alleged that…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Coca-Cola Company v. Howard Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
- Independent Baking Powder Co. v. BoormanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
- Radio Corporation of America v. Majestic DistributorsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. PlattU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.