Hall v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to real estate. The case was tried before Cant, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant insurance company appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
CANTY, J.1
This is an action to determine adverse claims. On the trial the court found for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial the defendant insurance company appeals.
So far as here material, Cowell’s addition to Duluth consisted of two blocks, as shown by the annexed plat:
*403
The addition is on a narrow neck of land bounded on the east by Lake Superior and on the west by the Bay of Superior. The plat extended some distance over into the shoal water in the bay. The blocks in the addition are not numbered, lettered, or otherwise designated; but the even-numbered lots are in the east…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sherin v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Wait v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Ramsey v. GlennySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Gilman v. Van BruntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by9 opinions
- Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Parker v. Smith Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Lamprey v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Hearne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.