Legal Opinion

Hudson v. West

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1957No. Sac. 6438Published

Hughes, Maul & Fogerty and Geoffrey A Hughes for Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

47 Cal.2d 823 (1957)

FRANCIS W. HUDSON et al., Appellants,

v.

THOMAS WEST et al., Respondents.

Sac. No. 6438.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Feb. 7, 1957.

Bradford, Cross, Dahl & Hefner and Loren S. Dahl for Appellants.

Henry Holsinger, Gavin M. Craig and Hugh W. Ferrier as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellants.

Hughes, Maul & Fogerty and Geoffrey A Hughes for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

By this action plaintiffs sought to confirm their right to take four inches of water from Grub Ravine during the irrigation season and to enjoin defendants' interference with that right. Defendants denied plaintiffs'…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API