Legal Opinion
Burgen v. Smith
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 30, 1970No. Civ. A. T-4503, T-4504PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL FINDINGS
TEMPLAR, District Judge.
These cases were consolidated for trial before the Court without a jury by agreement of the parties.
The contentions of the parties, as disclosed by their pleadings, are set forth generally in earlier rulings of the Court announced in connection with motions of defendant James O. Smith for summary judgment (Doc. 49) and will not be repeated here.
The main issues submitted for determination are:(1) Was defendant Hicks, the driver of a truck hauling a load of pipe for defendant Steel Haulers,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drake v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Bedenbender v. WallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Farmer v. Central Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Drennan v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Burgen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Nelson L. Burgen v. James O. Smith v. Nelson L. Burgen, Third Party Erma Jacobs, Wife and Heir at Law of Paul O. Jacobs v. James O. Smith v. Nelson L. Burgen, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972