Legal Opinion
US Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 2012No. 12 Civ. 6811 (CM) (JCF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case arises out of twelve life insurance policies known as Phoenix Accumulator Uni*284versal Life (“PAUL”) policies owned U.S. Bank National Association (“US Bank”) and issued by PHL Variable Insurance Company (“PHL”). US Bank alleges that PHL breached the terms of the policies and violated various laws by raising the of insurance rates on those policies in 2010 and 2011. PHL now moves to compel U.S. Bank’s production of documents and response to interrogatories. For the reasons set forth below, PHL’s motion is granted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriting, Inc. v. Jasam Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Capaccio v. ZafutoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
- Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- In re: AXA Equitable Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Jessore Management SA v. Brit Syndicate 2987District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.