Legal Opinion

Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 28, 2024No. SC20777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL May 28, 2024 120 MAY, 2024

349 Conn. 120

Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik DEUTSCHE BANK AG v. CAROLINE VIK ET AL. (SC 20777) D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff bank sought to recover damages from the defendants, A and his daughter, C, for, inter alia, their allegedly tortious interference with a business expectancy in connection with the plaintiff’s efforts to collect an approximately $243 million foreign judgment that it had obtained against S Co., which the plaintiff claimed was a shell company controlled by A. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Beecher v. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Fiondella v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ammar I. v. Dept. of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API