Legal Opinion

Maeker v. Ross

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 4, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SAPP-PETERSON, J.A.D.

In this appeal, we granted defendant, William Ross, a stay and leave to appeal the January 13, 2012 interlocutory order of the Family Part judge denying his motion to dismiss plaintiff, Beverly Maeker’s palimony complaint and granting her cross-motion for pendente lite support, which the motion judge fixed at $6000 per month. The motion judge found that plaintiff’s complaint was not barred by the 2010 amendment to the Statute of Frauds, N.J.S.A. 25:1—5(h) (Amendment), requiring a writing memorializing palimony agreements and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. BETSY M. ARAUCO VS. SANTOS A. PEREZ (FD-16-1263-16, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. KATHLEEN M. MOYNIHAN VS. EDWARD J. LYNCH (FM-03-0189-17, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  4. L.R. v. Division of Disability ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API