Maeker v. Ross
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SAPP-PETERSON, J.A.D.
In this appeal, we granted defendant, William Ross, a stay and leave to appeal the January 13, 2012 interlocutory order of the Family Part judge denying his motion to dismiss plaintiff, Beverly Maeker’s palimony complaint and granting her cross-motion for pendente lite support, which the motion judge fixed at $6000 per month. The motion judge found that plaintiff’s complaint was not barred by the 2010 amendment to the Statute of Frauds, N.J.S.A. 25:1—5(h) (Amendment), requiring a writing memorializing palimony agreements and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- BETSY M. ARAUCO VS. SANTOS A. PEREZ (FD-16-1263-16, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- KATHLEEN M. MOYNIHAN VS. EDWARD J. LYNCH (FM-03-0189-17, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- L.R. v. Division of Disability ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014