Kraul v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
Plaintiffs Karl Kraul and his mother Sandra Bouthiet appeal from an adverse judgment entered on a motion for a directed verdict in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wemick, A.R.J.). Plaintiffs sought to impose liability on Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. for failing to defend and provide coverage to an insured. Plaintiffs argue that the court erred in allowing defendant to amend its answer to conform to the evidence, and in directing a verdict on plaintiffs’ claims of implied contract and estoppel. 1 Upon review of the record, we conclude that the court did not err in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Baker v. Mid Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. ElwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- C.N. Brown Co. v. GillenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Kasu Corp. v. Blake, Hall & Sprague, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Jones v. Route 4 Truck & Auto RepairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Kraul v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996