Legal Opinion

Jones v. Route 4 Truck & Auto Repair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 15, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Martin Jones appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Kravchuk, J.) entering judgment for the defendant and denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial. Plaintiff contends that the Superi- or Court erred by excluding evidence that the engine motor was of no use to him because it lacked a vehicle identification number (“VIN”) and could not be resold; by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of negligence; and by denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial based on inconsistent verdicts. We conclude that the court erred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. SoucySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. Kraul v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Currier v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Fitzgerald v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Kaechele v. Kenyon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Net 2 Press, Inc. v. 58 Dix Avenue Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  5. Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API