Jones v. Route 4 Truck & Auto Repair
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Martin Jones appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Kravchuk, J.) entering judgment for the defendant and denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial. Plaintiff contends that the Superi- or Court erred by excluding evidence that the engine motor was of no use to him because it lacked a vehicle identification number (“VIN”) and could not be resold; by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of negligence; and by denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial based on inconsistent verdicts. We conclude that the court erred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richards v. SoucySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Kraul v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Currier v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Fitzgerald v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Kaechele v. Kenyon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Net 2 Press, Inc. v. 58 Dix Avenue Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.