Legal Opinion
Qwest Corp. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2012No. 11-2590PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (commission) entered an order requiring Qwest Corporation, a successor Bell operating company (BOC), 1 to submit for review and approval a price list and supporting rationale for certain telecommunication network facilities 47 U.S.C. § 271 requires Qwest to provide to its Minnesota competitors. Qwest sought judicial review and declaratory relief in the district court, arguing the commission’s order was preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act), Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified as amended in scattered sections…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Missouri Insurance Coalition v. HuffDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- Halvorson v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2019
- Sprint Communications Co. v. BernstenDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015
- Anderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.