Legal Opinion

Missouri Insurance Coalition v. Huff

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 22, 2013No. 4:12CV02354 AGFPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Missouri Insurance Coalition (“MIC”), Health Alliance Life Insurance Co. (“Health Alliance”), and HMO Missouri, Inc., seek a declaration that certain provisions of the recently-enacted Missouri Senate Bill 749, codified at Mo.Rev.Stat. § 376.1199, are void under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution because the state law is in direct conflict with the “contraceptive mandate” of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Affordable Care Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13, and its implementing regulations.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. O'Brien v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
  3. Qwest Corp. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  3. Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API