Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Frisbie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1984No. 2748PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence dated September 24, 1981. Appellant, Charles Frisbie, raises two issues for our consideration. The first issue is whether the trial judge erred in ruling that the evidence presented at appellant’s trial was not sufficient to put appellant’s sanity in issue. The second issue is whether the trial judge erred in sentencing appellant to one year probation on each of nine counts of recklessly endangering another person when these charges arose out of an automobile accident resulting from one unlawful act. Of these two issues, we find only…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. DemmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. Garcia-RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. PlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API