Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Plank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1984No. 387PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This appeal follows judgment of sentence for rape. 1 Appellant argues (1) the trial court erred when it refused to allow him to present an insanity defense; and (2) the prosecution failed to establish sufficient proof of forcible compulsion to sustain the jury’s verdict of guilty of rape as a felony of the first degree.

The facts of rape are undisputed. Appellant entered the victim’s home one Sunday morning. He threatened the woman, raped her and fled.

At trial, appellant attempted to «¡ítroduce an insanity defense. 2 The court refused to allow the testimony to go to the jury.

At…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DemmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Henderson v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Joseph Wallace v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. State v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. William Leach A/K/A William Martin v. Darrell Kolb, Acting Superintendent, and Attorney General of the State of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. SasseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API