Legal Opinion

Rand v. Wilson County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1955No. 239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaenhill, C. J.

The complaint does not allege specifically that the judgment entered in the action to try title to the lands described in the complaint was in effect a judgment by consent. Reference is made thereto as such in the briefs filed in this Court, and it was admitted during the oral argument that said judgment was in fact a consent judgment. Therefore, the motion entered by the plaintiffs in this Court for permission to amend the complaint to allege that said judgment was a consent judgment is allowed.

It is alleged in the complaint that the property described therein was listed for the years 1931…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Bunn v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Spruill v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Wake County v. . FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. In Re the Will of StimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Collins v. R. L. Coleman & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API