Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 20, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Settle

Affirming.

The appellant, Tom Mullins, by this appeal, seeks the reversal of a judgment of the Bell circuit court, based upon a verdict finding him guilty of the offense, charged by warrant, of “unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquor, to-wit: ‘Jamaica ginger,’ commonly called ‘ jake,’ knowingly for use as an intoxicating beverage.” The verdict and judgment fixed his punishment at a fine of $100.00' and imprisonment of 60 days in jail. The warrant was issued by the judge of the Middlesboro police court and the appellant first tried and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kash v. United Star Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Johnson's Administrator v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Vanover v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Bryant v. LangCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Pulliam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Partin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API