Mullins v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Settle
Affirming.
The appellant, Tom Mullins, by this appeal, seeks the reversal of a judgment of the Bell circuit court, based upon a verdict finding him guilty of the offense, charged by warrant, of “unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquor, to-wit: ‘Jamaica ginger,’ commonly called ‘ jake,’ knowingly for use as an intoxicating beverage.” The verdict and judgment fixed his punishment at a fine of $100.00' and imprisonment of 60 days in jail. The warrant was issued by the judge of the Middlesboro police court and the appellant first tried and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kash v. United Star Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Johnson's Administrator v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Vanover v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Bryant v. LangCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Pulliam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Partin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926