Legal Opinion
Gutierrez v. Wege
California Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1905No. L.A. Nos. 1640, 1641PublishedCited by 6 opinions
CROSS APPEALS from a judgment- of the Superior Court of Ventura County. Felix W. Ewing, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. G. H. Gould, and W. R. Edwards, for Soledad Gutierrez et al., Appellants and Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This action is brought to quiet title to the waters of Casitas Creek, a small stream having its rise in a spring on the land of defendant and flowing for some distance into the adjoining land of plaintiffs. The judgment in the-case is as follows:—
“1st. That the defendant owns and is entitled to the sole- and exclusive use of all the waters flowing from that certain spring situate upon the N. W. £ of the S. W. ^ of section 29, described in defendant’s amended answer, and to all waters flowing in said Casitas Creek above the reservoir situated near the south line of said land and in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Abram v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holman v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Cohen v. La Ca&209ada Land Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- L. Mini Estate Co. v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Williams v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.