Legal Opinion
Lorenz v. Watson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 1966No. Civ. A. 39390PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., District Judge.
This action for damages is brought under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.A. § 78a et seq.). The matter is presently before the Court on the motions of the Exchange, Bioren, John C. Korn and John F. Bunn, Jr., for dismissal, and on the motion of the defendants Bioren, Korn and Bunn for summary judgment in their favor.
It should be noted that the defendant J. Donald Watson is not presently represented before the Court, and that a default judgment was entered against him on March 17, 1966 for failure to appear, to plead or otherwise…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Kardon v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Richard Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.