Legal Opinion

Bank of Sherman v. Apperson

United States Circuit Court

Decided October 13, 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hammond, D. J.

On motion for a new trial. Upon full consideration of the arguments made opon this motion, I am satisfied w'ith the rulings I made upon the demurrer and at *26tHe trial' upon the points then raised against the negotiability of the note sued on. I think it entirely clear of all doubt that an administrator may negotiate a note made payable to him, and that the recital of the consideration in the face of the note does not at all affect its negotiable .character. If the note in question had said that it was subject to the agreement for the purchase of the. land, or used other words…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. First Nat. Bank of Hoquiam, Wash. v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Madera v. Herminio Madera, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
  4. Piedmont Carolina Ry. Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  5. Ivory v. LamoreauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API