Ivory v. Lamoreaux
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentFellows, J.
I am persuaded that under the provisions of the negotiable instruments law the note in question is negotiable. Section 3 of the act (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 6042) provides:
“An instrument, to be negotiable, must conform to the following requirements: * * *
■ “Second, It must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a certain sum of money.”
Section 5 of the act (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 6044) provides:
_ “An unqualified order or promise to pay is unconditional within the meaning of this act, though coupled with: * * *
“Second, A statement of the transaction which gives rise to the instrument.”
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Citizens Nat. Bank v. BuckheitAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Strand Amusement Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.