First Nat. Bank of Hoquiam, Wash. v. DeWitt
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.
This bill in this ease seeks recovery against appellee, John T. DeWitt, trading as DeWitt & Meredith, by reason of his alleged unconditional promise in writing to accept a trade acceptance in the sum of $6,370.
On February 7, 1930, appellee (hereinafter referred to as defendant) wired Whitney-Ellsworth Company, a firm of brokers, packers, and distributors of canned salmon, as follows:
“If you desire, you may ship us minimum car first quality chums guaranteed by yourselves dollar thirty regular brokerage date invoice sixty days salmon selling slowly but expect better prices later. Wire reply…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Strand Amusement Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Klots Throwing Co. v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Ehrichs v. . De MillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B. F. Myers & Son of Goodlettsville, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Uhlhorn v. KeltnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Madera v. Herminio Madera, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
- B. F. Myers & Son of Goodlettsville, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.