Cars & Concepts, Inc. v. Funston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
We reverse judgment by default in this treble damages case for want of jurisdiction of the person of the defendant.
Randy Funston, as plaintiff, brought suit, under the Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann., Subchapter E. “Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection”, § 17.41, et seq, and including § 17.46, “Deceptive Trade Practices Unlawful” (in sub. (b) “(5) representing that goods . . . have . characteristics, . . . benefits, or quantities which they do not have . . .”).
Date suit originally brought was June 26, 1978, and in plaintiffs petition the defendants named…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitney v. L & L REALTY CORPORATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Prine v. American Hydrocarbons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Brace v. BusboonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCraw v. Vickers, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Roberts v. Niekerk, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- UNL Inc. v. Oak Hills Photo Finishing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
- Morris v. Zesati, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Roland Communications, Inc. v. American Communications Corpus Christi, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.