State v. Haun
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from court of appeals, southern department; A. W. Dennison, M. Schoonover, and B. F. Milton, judges, STATEMENT. The appellant was convicted in the district court for a violation of chapter 145, Laws of 1897 (Gen. Stat. 1897, ch. 73, §§ 22-26), which reads : “An Act to secure to laborers and others the payment of their wages, and prescribing a penalty for the violation of this act, and repealing section 2441, 2442 and 2443 of the General Statutes of 1889, and all acts…
Read the full summary
Appeal from court of appeals, southern department; A. W. Dennison, M. Schoonover, and B. F. Milton, judges, STATEMENT. The appellant was convicted in the district court for a violation of chapter 145, Laws of 1897 (Gen. Stat. 1897, ch. 73, §§ 22-26), which reads : “An Act to secure to laborers and others the payment of their wages, and prescribing a penalty for the violation of this act, and repealing section 2441, 2442 and 2443 of the General Statutes of 1889, and all acts and parts of acts in conflict herewith. lBe it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: “ Section 1. It shall…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
In sustaining the constitutionality.of the act under consideration the court of appeals held that it applied only to corporations and trusts severally employing ten or more persons ; and further, that the act is constitutional as a valid exercise of legislative authority to alter and amend corporate charters. The fact has been ignored that the complaint upon which the appellant was tried and convicted does not charge that the coal company for which he was acting was incorporated under the laws of this state. The agreed statement of facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Zillmer v. KreutzbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. GarbroskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Rosin v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Marshall v. Consumers Warehouse Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.