Legal Opinion

Zamudio v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1999No. A080118PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEVENS, J.

J.Appellant Ramon Zamudio contends the trial court wrongly granted summary judgment in his action against the City and County of San Francisco, Tutor-Saliba Corporation, and Largo Concrete, Inc. The issue presented is whether an injured employee of a subcontractor on a construction project, who has received workers’ compensation benefits for his injury, is barred from pursuing a lawsuit in tort for the same injury against the owner of the construction project, its construction manager, and his employer. We conclude summary judgment was properly granted, and affirm the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hayes v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Berger v. GoddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ray v. Silverado ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Kinney v. CSB Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Ruiz v. Herman Weissker, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Gravelin v. SatterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API