Legal Opinion
Gravelin v. Satterfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 2011No. A131333PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
Plaintiff Gary Gravelin, a hired worker, was injured while installing a satellite dish on the roof of a residence. He received workers’ compensation and brought this separate action against the homeowners for premises liability. The trial court granted a defense summary judgment. We affirm the judgment.
*1212I. FACTS
Defendants are Raymond and Charlotte Coolidge and their grandson, Paul Satterfield. Defendants own a home in Mendocino County. The Coolidges contracted with DISH Network to replace their existing satellite dish. DISH Network outsourced the job to Linkus Enterprises,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gregory Edison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Tverberg v. Fillner Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Taylor v. Trimble, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Alvarez v. Seaside Transp. Servs. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Aghanazari v. American Medical Response Ambulance Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.