Legal Opinion

Beaulac v. Beaulac

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1948No. Civ. 16120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

This is an action for divorce. At the time of the trial it was announced in behalf of plaintiff that no evidence would be introduced in support of the complaint. Therefore, the case proceeded to trial upon the issues raised by the cross-complaint filed by the wife and the answer thereto. An interlocutory decree was granted to the wife on the grounds of extreme cruelty and adultery. She appealed from the judgment insofar as it awarded her no alimony or attorney’s fees, and also from those portions of the decree which award her $80 per month for the support of the minor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Storm v. StormWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pope v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Fernández v. DavisonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API