Legal Opinion

Saalfield v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1918No. 101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke

This is an appeal to review a judgment by the Court of Claims in favor of the Government, on a claim for damages growing out of a written contract dated May 18, 1898, for the manufacture of 50 wire-wound rapid fire guns, 25 of 5-inch caliber and 25 of 6-inch caliber. No guns having been delivered under the contract it was annulled by the Chief of Ordnance, with the approval of the Secretary of War, in an order, notice of which was given to the claimants on January 17, 1901. The appellant is the administrator of the survivor of one of two claimants to whom we shall refer in this opinion as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowe v. PeytonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. Needles ex rel. Needles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Varney v. WarehimeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. Tatum v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API