Legal Opinion

Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1933No. K-508PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

This ease involves an alleged tax overpayment of $72,219.68, for 1918, by reason of the disallowance by the Commissioner of a deduction from gross income ef $80,419.21 determined to be worthless and charged off by plaintiff in 1918, This alleged debt from Brown and Munsell to plaintiff arose and accrued between May, 1898, and December, 1905, under a certain contract between Brown and Munsell and plaintiff’s predecessor, the Diamond Drill & Machine Company, for the manufacture by plaintiff of certain guns and gun mounts for which Brown and Munsell had a contract with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Saalfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Broadway Savings Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  5. Daniels & Fisher Stores Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parmelee Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. American Processing and Sales Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Iowa Southern Utilities Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Zimmerman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1962
  5. Agarano v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API