Legal Opinion
Aerated Products Co. v. Department of Health
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 15, 1945No. C-1645PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a corporation of the State of Pennsylvania, is licensed to distribute and sell a product known under the trade-mark or trade name of “Instantwhip”. The product or “Mix”, as it is sometimes called, consists of the following ingredients: Milk or cream ,of a certain butterfat content, suger and vanilla. This combination is placed in a specially constructed pint container and seven grams of nitrous oxide gas are inserted in the overhead space under pressure. Each container consists of an all steel bottom with a separate stem in which a valve core is inserted.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert F. Urbano v. The Board of Managers of the New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Aerated Products Co. of Philadelphia v. Department of Health of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.