Legal Opinion

Quesnel v. Quesnel

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-020PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

The parties were divorced by decree of the Washington Superior Court after a contested hearing. Defendant hus*150band appeals the trial court’s property disposition and its award of permanent maintenance to plaintiff. We affirm.

Defendant first complains that the trial court’s division of the marital assets is inequitable because of the respective contributions of the parties to the marital estate. He also assigns error to the award of maintenance, arguing that the court wrongly attempted to equalize the monthly incomes of the parties. Defendant maintains further that the court awarded funds to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Buttura v. ButturaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Beaudry v. BeaudrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Philburt v. PhilburtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Chaker v. ChakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API