Legal Opinion

Raimondi v. Bianchi

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant obtained a judgment for $2,200 in the Essex common pleas, representing the balance of a $2,500 counsel fee claimed to be due him from the complainant on an express contract, which was denied by the complainant.

The complainant here (the defendant in the action at law) offered to prove at the trial that the services rendered by the defendant were not of the value of the amount claimed, but was not permitted to do so, because the complaint was founded on an express agreement.

Execution has been issued on the judgment at law, and complainant applies for an injunction restraining…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. BulkleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  2. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  3. Kelley v. SchwinghammerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  4. Porter v. BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  5. Executors of Powers v. Administrator of ButlerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Appell v. ReinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Sun B. L. Assn. v. RashkesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. In Re RomaineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933
  4. Dwyer v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Stein v. SchmitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API