Legal Opinion

Zerman v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1986No. 82 Civ. 4527 (MP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

MEMORANDUM

This is a motion by plaintiff Evelyn Zerman to amend the complaint by rejoining Robert Fomon and George Ball as defendants, by adding Edward Gioiella as a defendant, and by adding RICO claims against all four defendants under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and 1964(c) and of Florida’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, FSA § 895.01 et seq. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied.

BACKGROUND

This suit was originally brought by Evelyn Zerman (“Zerman”) pro se against George Ball (“Ball”), Robert Fomon (“Fomon”) and E.F. Hutton…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Evelyn ZERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BALL, Robert Fomon, and E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Zerman v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Hoke v. EF HUTTON AND CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Zerman v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Telford v. BradeenDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API