Legal Opinion

Hoke v. EF HUTTON AND CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1988No. 8726SC1211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

The trial court’s Order dismissing only Counts 3, 4 & 5 of plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, not being final as to all claims, see N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) of the N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure, requires us to determine whether the trial court’s Order was immediately appealable. Given our Supreme Court’s construction of Rule 54(b) in Ostreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118, 225 S.E. 2d 797 (1976) establishing the rule that a plaintiff has a substantial right to have all claims for relief tried simultaneously before the same judge and jury, we hold that plaintiffs’ appeal is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club and Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Anderson v. Coastal Cmtys. at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2012
  3. Lash ex rel. Wilson v. LashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club and Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Watson Electrical Construction Co. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API