Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Scott
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1983No. 44799PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Defendant-appellee, Walter Scott, pleaded no contest in Cleveland Municipal Court to violations of R.C. 4301.58(B) (selling, keeping, or possessing alcohol for sale without permit) and R.C. 4399.09 (keeping a place where liquor is sold in violation of law). For each violation the court imposed a fine of $100, with $50 suspended.
From this judgment the city of Cleveland appeals, assigning one error for our review:
“I. The trial court erred in holding that the mandatory fine enacted for keeping a place where intoxicating liquors are sold is unconstitutional.”
This assignment of error is raised in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Gordon v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Madjorous v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CravensOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. SnufferOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. KollerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DopartOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.