Legal Opinion

Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 1993No. 91-2027, 91-2035; CA A71688PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiffs petition for review of our decision affirming the trial court’s judgment against them in this mandamus action under ORS 215.428. 115 Or App 425, 838 P2d 1095 (1992). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it to address two of plaintiffs’ contentions.

ORS 215.428(1) provides that a county “shall take final action” on an application for a land use permit within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. Plaintiffs argue that we erred in concluding that, for purposes of ORS 215.428, the county “took final action” on plaintiffs’ permit application…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Simon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edney v. Columbia County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Fraley v. Deschutes County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Oregon Pipeline Co. v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API