People v. Arredondo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Statement Of The Case
Appellant, 19 years of age, was convicted by a jury of having sexual intercourse with a girl 15 years of age in violation of Penal Code section 261.5. The jury, pursuant to Penal Code section 264, recommended that appellant be punished by imprisonment in the state prison. After referring the matter to the probation office for a report and recommendation as to appellant’s suitability for probation the trial court sentenced appellant to prison.
Appellant makes two basic contentions; first, that Penal Code section 264 is unconstitutional insofar as it allows…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. AndersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. KonowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.