Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2008No. C052649PublishedCited by 34 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

Following her three-month employment as a caregiver for Billy C., an elderly and dependent adult, defendant used blank checks, credit cards and identifying information unlawfully taken from Billy to obtain cash, purchase automobiles and acquire other merchandise. She was convicted of 51 offenses, including 22 counts of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470, subd. (d)), four counts of receiving stolen property (id., § 496), three counts of wrongful use of personal identifying information (id., § 530.5), and various drug-related offenses. (Further undesignated section references are to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. KirvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API