Legal Opinion

Harris v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 20, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02180Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES HARRIS, ) CASE NO. 1:19-cv-2180 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER PENTAIR FLOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) ) DEFENDANT. ) In this employment discrimination action, defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s state law claims for age discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Doc. No. 5 [“MTD”].) Plaintiff opposes the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 10 [“Opp’n MTD”]) and has filed a motion to amend the complaint (Doc. No. 9 [“MTA”]). Defendant opposes the motion to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API