Legal Opinion

Waggaman v. Nutt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.). The plaintiff’s prayer, which was granted, instructed the jury that “if they shall find from the evidence in this case that the plaintiff purchased from the defendant and one Harvey L. Page, 19 shares of stock in the Sinepuxent Beach Company for the sum of $2,090.00, and agreed that said defendant and Page should have one-half the profit that might be realized on said stock; and it was agreed that said stock was…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.). The plaintiff’s prayer, which was granted, instructed the jury that “if they shall find from the evidence in this case that the plaintiff purchased from the defendant and one Harvey L. Page, 19 shares of stock in the Sinepuxent Beach Company for the sum of $2,090.00, and agreed that said defendant and Page should have one-half the profit that might be realized on said stock; and it was agreed that said stock was to be placed by said Waggaman and Page in a pool for eight years, or until such time as this plaintiff might become…

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This is a proceeding by attachment instituted on July 14th, 1897, in the Superior Court of Baltimore City by the appellee, Calvin R. Nutt, a citizen of Frederick, Maryland, .against the appellant, John F. Waggaman, a resident of the city of Washington. The trial below was upon the short note case. The cause of action was. as follows: “John F. Waggaman'to Calvin R. Nutt. To amount due for the stock in the Sinepuxent Beach Company, which the said Waggaman agreed to pay the said Nutt, upon the said Nutt giving the said Waggaman notice that he wanted a return of the valuation put on said stock by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cruzen v. McKaigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. Spencer v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Culbertson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bluthenthal & Bickart v. May Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Carroll v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Rosenthal v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API