Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Heft

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1930No. [No. 44, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case (Rosenthal v. Heft, 155 Md. 410), it was decided that the defendant, as one of two grantees of certain real estate, encumbered by two mortgages, was amenable to suit by the grantors for the amount of the second mortgage, for which a judgment had been recovered against them by the mortgagee, but that a similar claim for reimbursement with respect to a balance due on the first mortgage was barred by limitations, since that claim did not accrue within three years prior to the suit, which was otherwise sustained as enforcing an implied and not a covenanted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Rosenthal v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Merrick v. Trustees of the BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  4. Cruzen v. McKaigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  5. Spencer v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Maryland Oil Company v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API