Bluthenthal & Bickart v. May Advertising Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Soper, C. J.) The facts are stated iu the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The May Advertising Company, the appellee on this record, is a New York corporation. As its name indicates, it is engaged in the advertising business, which it conducts by painting bulletin boards, erecting them along the lines of railroads, and by securing wall space and painting thereon such advertisements on signs as its customers may desire. Carl May is the president and Wilson O. Peed the vice-president of the company. The office of the company is in New York City, and it has a shop in Pittsburgh, Pa., where sketches are made, and the metal bulletin boards are painted. The appellant,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Brydon ex rel. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Adams v. CapronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Corbett v. WolfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Fifer v. Clearfield & Cambria Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Grossfeld v. BravermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.