Legal Opinion

Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Plaintiff was an employee of the defendant. His left hand was injured, and blood poisoning developed so that amputation became necessary. The hand was amputated about an inch above the wrist. The compensation commission found that "the injury resulting in the loss of plaintiff's hand was not the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment," and denied plaintiff compensation. The circuit court, on appeal, reversed the award of the commission, and entered judgment for plaintiff, awarding him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Koller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Buschling v. AckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Birmingham Drainage District v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Wells v. HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grenier v. Alta Crest Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1948
  2. Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Silas v. ACF Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Federated Metals Corp. v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Baker v. Massey Harris Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API