Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Scheetz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission recommended that James Scott Seheetz be reprimanded for his failure to handle in a timely manner three probate matters he accepted. We agree and publicly reprimand Seheetz for his neglect of legal matters entrusted to his care.
I. Background Fads and Proceedings.
Seheetz graduated from law school and became licensed to practice law in Iowa in 1990. He was an associate in a private practice firm, where he remained for about two years.
In 1992 Seheetz terminated his employment because he thought…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BlomkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ConzettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PrachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. LickissSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John D. HedgecothSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GottschalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. PrachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Amended June 24, 2015 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John D. HedgecothSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.