Legal Opinion

Pamela Hanson v. Caterpillar, Incor

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 3, 2012No. 11-3292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Pamela Hanson brought this action alleging that her employer, Caterpillar, Inc., fired her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment for Caterpillar, reasoning that Hanson was not a “qualified individual with a disability” as defined by the ADA. We affirm.

I. Background

On October 11, 2004, Caterpillar hired Pamela Hanson as a supplemental assembler for its manufacturing plant in Aurora, Illinois. Under the plant’s collective bargaining agreement, supplemental employees work forty hours…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harney v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Janice Draper v. Timothy MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Miller v. Illinois Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Robert Peters v. City of MaustonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Fredricksen v. United Parcel Service, Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David Feldman v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. DiGiosia v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  3. Perrywatson v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Medina v. Buckner-PenaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API