Hudson v. Columbian Transfer Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Horace A. Hudson against the Columbian Transfer Company for the value of goods destroyed by fire while stored in defendant’s warehouse. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action is brought to recover the value of goods stored with the defendant as warehouseman, and destroyed by fire. The record contains 38 assignments of error, but, when the facts are stated as evidently found by the jury, the case lies within a narrow compass.
The parties are not quite agreed in their statement of the case, but an examination of the record convinces us that there was ample testimony tending to show that defendant, in March, 1901, contracted and used for storage the building known as 21 and 23 Campau street, in the city of Grand Rapids, and also controlled the fourth floor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lane v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Brewington v. MeskerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Bradley v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Martin v. . CuthbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Line v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Fletcher v. School Dist. Bd. of Ed.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Nathan v. Tremont Storage Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Pilson v. Tip-Top Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Wiley v. LockeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.