Legal Opinion

Miller v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. C. W. Vermillion, Judge. Suit on a claim for board, washing, nursing, and attendance, and for the care and keeping of horses and for money loaned. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

-The items of account upon which this suit ivas founded were alleged to have been furnished the deceased, Elizabeth Hale, from August 17, 1892, to March 31, 1897, the largest one of which was for her board, washing, and the attendance of a servant, during that period. That the deceased lived with plaintiff and his family during the greater part of the time stated is undisputed, the evidence for the defendant tending only to show that from some inde*87finite time in 1896, np to the 31st day of March, 1897, she spent a part of the time at the home of a relative near by; but the length of each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. QuimbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Wendeling v. BesserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Carroll v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Charles City Plow & Manf'g Co. v. Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Gavin v. BischoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowie v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Baker v. OughtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Desmond v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API