Legal Opinion

Gavin v. Bischoff

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 9, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Johnson District Court. — How. S. H. Faikall, Judge. Action upon an account. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for a part of'her claim, from which she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. Statute of limitations: current account: contract. I. The action is brought on an account for labor, for cash, and for the rent -of a seiying-machine, commencing in 1865 and ending in 1888. For the first sixteen years the account con-tains one item of charge each year for labor. For the last fourteen years one item of thirty-six dollars each year is1 charged for the rent of a sewing-machine. There is one cash item of charge for 1879, fifty dollars, and for 1882 two, — one of $52.50, and the other for seven dollars. In 1883, and subsequently, there are three cash items of charges of three…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Gage v. PhillipsNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cedar County v. SagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Stephens v. ShortWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Clark v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API