Tucker v. Quimby
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Floyd GvrovAb Oovrt. Thursday, June 19. This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace and removed to the circuit court on writ of error, where the judgment of the justice was reversed and the cause remanded for a re-trial. The defendant appeals. The further facts necessary to a proper understanding of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The plaintiff brought his action before the justice, claiming of the defendant $20.05, on a boot account, a copy of which is as follows:
1867.
1. Jan. 8, To wagon tongue...................$2 50
2. Jan. 16, To one pair whiffletrees.............. 3 50
3., Jan. 16, To clasp on tongue and mending tire.. 75
4.' Jan. 18, To mending sled and trace and bolts .,. 1 10
5. Jan. 18, To one reach for sled................ 1 25
6. Eeb. 16, To setting eight shoes, 25c........... 2 00‘
7. Feb. 18, To setting eight shoes and toecalts, two shoes........................... 2 10-
8. Feb. 28, To setting one…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Porter v. Chicago, Iowa & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Roger's Backhoe Service, Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- E. A. Higley & Co. v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Leland v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.