Bartlett v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
Frederick J, Sculin, Jr., Senior United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and (7)'of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See generally Dkt. No, 109.
II. BACKGROUND1
In 1989, New York State sued Allied-Signal Inc., seeking to compel Allied-Signal to undertake the cleanup of Onondaga Lake under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, arid Liability Act (“CERCLA”). In 1992, Allied-Signal Inc. ánd New York State entered *234into a consent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bartlett v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- York v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Guidance and Electronics Company Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022